![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| APRIL 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've been warned that people do not read newsletters as long as this one. I certainly hope this is not true, because the words that follow have special meaning to me, and I would love to know that they were read. The 40 Percent RuleAmerican business has a weight problem: its communications are obese. Unintentionally, I recently documented the size of this problem. In December, we began work for an investment firm. Curious, I compared their old website with our new version. With no loss of meaning, every new section was 39-41% shorter. In February we began helping a commercial real estate company. Again, we compared their old and new copy. It, too, was 40% shorter. Last week, we pruned a Silicon Valley tech company's home page, and you guessed it. These experiences reminded me of John Wanamaker’s well-known quote. "Half of my advertising is wasted," the famous retailer said. "The problem is, I don't know which half." With few exceptions, over half of sales and marketing copy today is wasted. It's stuffed with flabby claims and pronouncements of philosophy, corpulent adverbs and adjectives, and slow waddlings toward ideas rather than beelines to them. No doubt I fail, too. And when I do, you stop reading. The next time you look at your communications, look harder. See those ten lines of copy? Shrink them to six. Five paragraphs? Shrink them to three.
Shorter copy is clearer, and people buy clarity.
Follow the 40 percent rule. Cut all of your copy in half, and then a little more.
Speaking of overweight websites, consider the popular "In the News" sections on many of them. These sections usually backfire. It's not because people don't love news. They do. It's because these sections aren't news. They're six months, a year, even three years old. Often, there's a sound explanation. The site managers realize that few people read "News" section headlines, much less read the stories, so these managers focus on revenue-relevant activities instead. Unfortunately, the readers who do drift into these sections realize that the information is stale, and then wonder about the firm. How professional can a company be that cannot update its news once a month? These sections scuff the company's shoes when they should be shining them. The firm, for example, serves clients nationwide. But seven of every eight "news" items come from The Philadelphia Inquirer, the paper in the firm's headquarter city. The result? The firm looks less successful and national than they are. Is there any value in "In the News" sections? The answer seems simple. If something truly is news and it reflects well on the company, it -- or at least a link to it -- should be on the home page, where people can see it. If it's front-page news, put it there. If it's not, put it in the wastebasket. |
Words About Words
The Lighter Side Just out, the YouTube awards suggest that while life is hard, comedy is nearly impossible. Also, the four nominations for videos starring cats (including a startling one featuring an alligator in a surprise cameo) suggest that Morris, Garfield, and The Cat in the Hat simply tap a human fascination with felines. (Our snooty Himalayan Simone has flown -- eight stories -- and lived to purr about it.) I am featured in the new book The Ten Secrets of the World's Best Communicators. Great news, but learning this prompts this: Why don't my kids understand me? After thorough study, Nobel Laureate Ed Purcell concluded that every baseball record was in the realm of probability -- except Joe DiMaggio's 56-game hitting streak. (Perhaps. But someone will beat that record several centuries before anyone even threatens the one unbreakable record in sports: Johnny VanderMeer's two consecutive no-hitters.) Howard Shultz has decided the key to Starbuck’s future is superior-tasting coffee. But superior taste didn’t work for flame-broiled Burger King, nor Coke, nor Pepsi Challenge Winner Pepsi, and all three companies soon abandoned those taste-focused strategies. We bet that strategy won't won’t work for Starbucks, either; we are quoting 12-1 odds against him. Before he proceeds, Schulz should reconsider this: in blind taste tests, people prefer McDonald's coffee to Starbucks. But a person is more apt to hit in 57 consecutive baseball games than to decide, "Gosh, I'd love some good coffee. Better head to McDonald's." Show of hands: Who reading this would ever stop at McDonald's for coffee? In the words of Ben Stein's character in Ferris Bueller's Day Off: "Anyone? Anyone?" |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright 2008 © Harry Beckwith | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Smart Marketing Advice Print Websites TV/Radio
Packaging Displays Logos Success Stories Project Gallery Request an Evaluation Contact Us E-mail questions and comments for Harry Beckwith to invisble@bitstream.net. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||